Skip to main content

The Aftermath of Adpocalypse

Is the 'Adpocalypse' over yet? 

Adpocalypse was the term dubbed by the internet to the drama that happened several months ago on YouTube when advertisements were seen on controversial videos, which freaked out the advertisers. Videos that included hate speech or even links to terrorist groups... Read more at Forbes! 

Since then, YouTuber have dished up an AI bot and can be explained in their own words:
"in the first few hours of a video upload we use machine learning to determine if a video meets our advertiser-friendly guidelines. This also applies to scheduled live streams, where our systems look at the title, description, thumbnail and tags even before the stream goes live." 
Casey Neistat just recently made a video explaining his frustrations that the creators, whether small or large, are the lifeblood of YouTube. If people's livelihoods are invested in this company, and this is their way of making a living, they deserve to be treated properly and rewarded their fair share. But how can they when a video gets flagged and then they lose potential revenue as they await the appeal to YouTube? 

Here's what a fellow YouTube user (Spammels) wrote under Casey's video that sums up everything perfectly:
The AI bot has been in the wild now for 6 months and is the point of failure to the mass demonetization to the point an entire team has been created purely to validate the human requests being generated from it. However, only larger YouTubers actually get a reaction. Small YouTubers are kicked down and told to work harder and go away. I had 25 emails with YouTube Creator support that would copy and paste their blogs back to me and refused to assist in any way.   
The consensus is that the bot 90% of the time is wrong. People are suffering for no reason other than YouTube's inability to do the right thing. The solution is to let the AI bot continue teaching itself but remove it's ability to action it's conclusion. That same team that is checking the human validation requests could instead be checking the robots conclusions and confirming if it's correct or not. That would not only be a benefit to the robots education but also removes the damage being causes every single second of every single day.  
What a frustrating conundrum!  We'll provide more deets as to what solutions are available soon! 


~For now it's James signing off! 

Labels

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The feud continues! Idubzzz fires back with a 'Content Deputy'

YouTuber Idubzzz has finally released the long anticipated 'Content Deputy' after Ricegum's sloppy attempt to respond to the latest 'Content Cop'. For those who are unaware, Idubzzz's Content Deputy is a response video if the victim had replied to the Content Cop . Idubzzz's Content Deputy proved how Ricegum had failed to properly address the criticism detailed in the Content Cop video and instead has continued to manipulate his young audience by 'winning' arguments Idubzzz never even made. Some examples include; Ricegum believing that him being forgiven by the rape victim excuses his past actions, avoiding Idubzzz's criticism by shifting the blame to Pewdiepie and just so many more. In my opinion, Idubzzz's arguments just went right over Ricegum's head and maybe that explains his failure to properly respond to Idubzzz. This begs the question; is Ricegum even capable of basic comprehension? Another point proven by Idubzzz is th...
Post a Comment
Read more

Content Cop: Where are they now?

How effective is Content Cop? Content Cop is an immensely successful YouTube series by YouTuber iDubbbz. But how much does it affect the YouTubers that it is made about?  The first content cop made was made about Jinx, a growing reaction channel during the time on YouTube when reaction channels were really popular. He was close to 1.3 million subs at the time of the Content Cop. iDubbbz exposed Jinx for his lackluster and uncreative content. Following this Content Cop Jinx slowly released videos less frequently and lost more and more subs and views. It's hard to say whether Content Cop is the main reason Jinx's YouTube channel has died. But it did affect it greatly.  The FineBros were up next after their decision to trademark "react videos". However the Content Cop didn't add much to the already sinking ship that was their channel. They did decide to change their decision to trademark "react videos". Overall the Content Cop didn't affe...
Post a Comment
Read more

Demonetisation and where to now?

Where do we go from here? (Check out our previous post about this before reading on!) "The YouTube community is the body armour that stops competitors at getting at Youtube" - Casey Casey believes this recent disruption to the Google owned video platform may pave the way for possible competitors that can offer much more such as, a wider audience and better opportunities for creators to monetise their content. Twitch is an example of a platform that appears to be a viable competitor. Majority of its users are gamers who make videos.. who knows what could happen next? We're going to go through the suggestions that Casey Neistat have provided. Remember that drama with Jimmy Kimmel and the ad controversy? YouTube attempted to explain below that some select partners are allowed to run their own ads --> Casey asks the question "Why can't I or other creators create our own ads?"  This is a great idea that creators could h...
Post a Comment
Read more